Buying a Browser

Album Cover: The Black Album

"Young enough to know the right car to buy yet grown enough not to put rims on it."
Jay-Z / 30 Something

Posted on November 15, 2004 8:18 PM in Browsers
Warning: This blog entry was written two or more years ago. Therefore, it may contain broken links, out-dated or misleading content, or information that is just plain wrong. Please read on with caution.

In an article at the E-Commerce Times, Jupiter Research analyst Joe Wilcox is quoted as saying about the Opera web browser:

Opera is not free. Firefox is free. But people will pay for Opera if they see value.

I disagree. It's one thing to give Internet Explorer a run for its money through grassroots marketing and the promise of a more secure browsing experience. It's another to convince people who can browse for free that they should instead pay $39 to do so.

Just so I can end on a positive note, though, I do have to give Opera props for a sweet website.


KR on November 17, 2004 at 6:13 AM:

I paid my $39 for Opera a couple of years ago, simply because it moved a lot faster than IE or Mozilla on the system I had at the time. Since then, I've paid an additional $15 for an upgrade and don't regret it. IMHO, Opera still runs faster and smoother than either IE or Mozilla/Firefox on most sites. I use it for about 70% of my browsing, FF for about 20% and IE for 10%.


Bernie Zimmermann on November 17, 2004 at 2:19 PM:

KR, don't get me wrong. Opera is a great browser. I've always liked it, just never enough to see it eclipse my Firefox (and at one time, IE) usage. In the grand scheme of things, though, I just don't think charging $39 for a browser is a good business model. In my opinion, they will never surpass Microsoft in the browser share department with that particular model, whereas I see a faint light of hope for the Firefox model.


Arcanius on November 17, 2004 at 10:23 PM:

But Bernie, Firefox doesn't have a "Business Model" - It has a market share model with a chance of succeeding, but thats note exactly a business. Although I wouldn't buy it, if they make money with their model, then it is quite a good business model, even if they only have a very little market share.


KR on November 18, 2004 at 1:23 AM:

Opera will always be a tiny (and fiercely loyal) niche market, like Macs. I don't expect that to change. It will never take a huge bite out of IE's or FF's share, especially since they are free. I just like to have something that works better *for me* even if I have to pay a little for it rather than get it at no cost. I don't think anyone at Opera harbors illusions about their market share. The community and support is pretty awesome there, BTW.

I remember back in the early 70s paying a *lot* more for certain types of motion picture film stocks, just because they had a hard-to-define "something" I preferred over cheaper film. Sometimes you just have to go with what works best for you, even if it costs more. ;)

Back when I paid for Opera, Mozilla was still a clunky, crash-prone "work in progress" to say the least. That factors into my Opera preference and experience, I'm sure. Opera is still only a 3.5 mb download, emailer included. For someone like me on dialup, that makes a difference. I saw the value and got out my plastic. Another sales point for me was/is that Opera has a LOT of skins to choose from, unlike FF's few dozen or so. (BTW, I like your GrayModern, which is how I got here in the first place.)

Thanks and best wishes!


Post Comments

If you feel like commenting on the above item, use the form below. Your email address will be used for personal contact reasons only, and will not be shown on this website.


Email Address:



Check this box if you hate spam.